Journal of International Criminal Justice Advance Access published online on June 9, 2009
Journal of International Criminal Justice, doi:10.1093/jicj/mqp037
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unravelling the Extraterritorial Riddle
An Analysis of R (Hassan) v. Secretary of State for Defence
* Doctoral student, NYU School of Law. Thanks to Nehal Bhuta for helpful discussions about extraterritoriality and the referees for their comments. The usual disclaimer applies. [hwk228{at}nyu.edu]
| Abstract |
|---|
The European Convention on Human Rights imposes an obligation on contracting states to secure the rights of persons within their jurisdiction. Yet, the meaning of jurisdiction is contested, with the result that the extent of states extraterritorial obligations is unclear. R (Hassan) v. Secretary of State for Defence is the latest in a series of English cases to examine the obligations of the British forces in Iraq. This comment critically assesses the High Court's reasoning, as well as the House of Lords decision in Al-Skeini on which it relies, and in so doing proposes a more nuanced understanding of jurisdiction.