Skip Navigation



Journal of International Criminal Justice Advance Access published online on June 3, 2009
Journal of International Criminal Justice, doi:10.1093/jicj/mqp033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/2/307    most recent
mqp033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilt, H.G. v. d.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2009, All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Symposium

The Continuous Quest for Proper Modes of Criminal Responsibility

H.G. van der Wilt*

* Professor of International Criminal Law and Fellow, Amsterdam Centre for International Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [H.G.vanderWilt{at}uva.nl]


  Abstract

The author discusses the recent decision of the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber to issue an arrest warrant against President Al Bashir from the viewpoint of the choice of the alleged mode of responsibility. In emphasizing the need and the difficulty of choosing the most proper concept of criminal responsibility, he explains how international criminal law has oscillated from the notion of joint criminal enterprise to the concept of co-perpetration and other forms of participation. In particular, he illustrates how in the first decisions in the ICC system (Lubanga, Katanga and Chui) the notions of co-perpetration and perpetration-by-means have been at the core of the case law. In this regard, he analyses both the majority opinion and the dissent of judge Usacka in Al Bashir, highlighting the strong influence of German legal thought on the ICC Statute and on recent ICC case law.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.