Skip Navigation


Journal of International Criminal Justice Advance Access originally published online on June 12, 2009
Journal of International Criminal Justice 2009 7(2):353-372; doi:10.1093/jicj/mqp019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/2/353    most recent
mqp019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2009, All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Troubled Indictments at the Special Court for Sierra Leone

The Pleading of Joint Criminal Enterprise and Sex-based Crimes

Cecily Rose*

*Former Associate Legal Officer, Special Court for Sierra Leone. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and are not attributable to the Special Court. Many thanks to Marko Milanovic and Kate Cronin-Furman for their comments on earlier versions of this article. [cecily.rose{at}gmail.com]


  Abstract

This article argues that the indictments at the Special Court for Sierra Leone have pleaded joint criminal enterprise and sex-based crimes in ways that both threaten the rights of the accused and weaken the Prosecution's cases against them. While the Taylor Indictment neglects to outline the purpose of the joint criminal enterprise in which the accused allegedly took part, the Prosecution's recent arguments in this respect have further confused the matter. In addition, the RUF and AFRC indictments alleged forced marriage without clearly indicating what crime such conduct would violate. Although the Appeals Chamber provided guidance on the issues of joint criminal enterprise and forced marriage in its recent AFRC Appeal Judgment, its pronouncements may be of limited use or applicability to the ongoing Taylor case.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.