Skip Navigation

Journal of International Criminal Justice 2009 7(4):703-721; doi:10.1093/jicj/mqp056
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dörmann, K.
Right arrow Articles by Geiβ, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2009, All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Journal of International Criminal Justice issue: Special Issue The Grave Breaches Regime in the Geneva Conventions: A Reassessment SixtyYears On [View the issue table of contents]

The Implementation of Grave Breaches into Domestic Legal Orders

Knut Dörmann* and Robin Geiβ**

*Head of the Legal Division of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The views expressed in this article reflect the author's opinions and not necessarily those of the ICRC. [kdormann{at}icrc.org]

**Legal advisor at the Legal Division of the ICRC. The views expressed in this article reflect the author's opinions and not necessarily those of the ICRC. [rgeiss{at}icrc.org]


   Abstract

States are required to implement grave breaches within their domestic criminal law. The obligation to enact legislation necessary to provide effective penal sanctions in relation to grave breaches lies at the heart of any meaningful prosecution of grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions. Knowing what is required of states and understanding the different models of implementation is essential. Yet, despite its importance, this specific obligation has led a somewhat shadowy existence, often neglected in state practice and academic research. It is against this background that the present contribution aims to bring into focus the scope and precise content of this somewhat ambiguously formulated obligation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.