Skip Navigation

Journal of International Criminal Justice 2009 7(4):657-682; doi:10.1093/jicj/mqp060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandoz, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2009, All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Journal of International Criminal Justice issue: Special Issue The Grave Breaches Regime in the Geneva Conventions: A Reassessment SixtyYears On [View the issue table of contents]

The History of the Grave Breaches Regime

Yves Sandoz*

*Member of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Professor of International Humanitarian Law at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights and the University of Fribourg.


   Abstract

Criminal punishment for violations of the laws of war date to the earliest formal codifications. In particular, the Lieber Code of 1863 contained a large number of references to criminal punishment, which ultimately influenced a large number of the subsequent treaties. This said, initial codifications of the laws and customs of war after Lieber but before the Geneva Conventions of 1949 made only scant reference to individual criminal liability. Nonetheless, the grave breaches regime emerged in 1949 as an important response to the sufferings of Second World War. The idea behind the regime was that certain offences were sufficiently grave to warrant explicit codifications as war crimes. The development of grave breaches was then continued in 1977, first by the inclusion of further offences within Additional Protocol I, then by inclusion of the grave breaches regime within the Statute of the International Criminal Court. As a general rule, this development has nonetheless involved developing rules to deal with the horrors of the past. Potentially, history will serve as a helpful guide for countering the numerous challenges that face grave breaches in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.