Skip Navigation


Journal of International Criminal Justice Advance Access originally published online on October 16, 2007
Journal of International Criminal Justice 2007 5(5):1083-1089; doi:10.1093/jicj/mqm064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/5/1083    most recent
mqm064v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sader, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2007, All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Symposium

A Lebanese Perspective on the Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Hopes and Disillusions

Choucri Sader*

* Choucri Sader, Judge, currently presides over the Department of Legislation and Consultations at the Lebanese Ministry of Justice. He has occupied several positions in the Lebanese judiciary dealing with matters ranging from commercial cases, to arbitration, bankruptcy, personal status and exequatur of foreign judgments. He has also presided for five years over a Court of Appeals in Beirut and was appointed for two years as the District Attorney of Mount Lebanon. He has taught civil law, commercial law and civil liberties in two Lebanese universities since 1976. Judge Sader was a member of the Lebanese delegation that worked with the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs during the negotiation and finalizing of the Agreement and the Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. [ saderchoucri{at}hotmail.com]


  Abstract

The author, a Lebanese judge and member of the Lebanese delegation that negotiated the Statute of the Special Tribunal, affirms the constitutionality of the Special Tribunal and discusses its promise, innovations and shortcomings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.