Skip Navigation


Journal of International Criminal Justice Advance Access originally published online on November 3, 2006
Journal of International Criminal Justice 2006 4(5):1074-1086; doi:10.1093/jicj/mql062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
4/5/1074    most recent
mql062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pieth, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press, 2006, All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

III. Countering Terrorism on a Global Scale

Criminalizing the Financing of Terrorism

Mark Pieth*

* Professor of Criminal Law, University of Basel, Switzerland. [ Mark.Pieth{at}unibas.ch]


   Abstract

This article begins with the widespread expectation that ‘following the money trail’ would be an effective means of hampering terrorist activity. So far, however, that effectiveness has been less than certain, and financial services providers argue that, at most, they would be able to check names against lists (they are adamant that the risk-based approach does not apply here). Legal difficulties deepen the factual problems: bold statements in international Conventions that terrorist activities are not political crimes, do not really solve the fundamental dilemma that a distinction needs to be made between freedom fighters and terrorists if combatants are merely aiming at the restoration of the democratic order. On a more practical level, international organizations (namely the United Nations and the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering) have created a system of mechanisms to freeze suspected funds of terrorism. So far, the procedures for freezing and de-freezing do not meet the generally accepted standards of a fair hearing (as defined by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or the European Convention on Human Rights). The author concludes that the current way of dealing with the issue of financing of terrorism is far from convincing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PolicingHome page
D. Marron
Money Talks, Money Walks: The War on Terrorist Financing in the West
Policing, January 1, 2008; 2(4): 441 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.