Skip Navigation

Journal of International Criminal Justice 2004 2(3):810-825; doi:10.1093/jicj/2.3.810
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koskenniemi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Symposium on Contributions to the History of International Criminal Justice

Hersch Lauterpacht and the Development of International Criminal Law

Martti Koskenniemi1

1 Professor of International law, University of Helsinki. Member of the International Law Commission.

Hersch Lauterpacht (1897–1960) was arguably the last century’s most influential international lawyer. His work was based on an attack on sovereignty and embraced the domestic analogy – the view that there was no good reason to differentiate between the legal (and moral) principles applicable in the domestic and the international realm. This applied likewise (and perhaps above all) to principles of criminal responsibility. From 1940 onwards, Lauterpacht argued that the defence of superior orders was no longer good law – a view that found its way eventually to the British Military Manual. In 1944, he published the first article on the coming war-crimes trial. Lauterpacht was also instrumental in the insertion of the notion of ‘crimes against humanity’ in the London Charter. He went to Nuremberg and parts of the speeches of the British Special Prosecutor, Hartley (later Lord) Shawcross, came from his pen. Lauterpacht’s writings embody much of the ethos of present-day international criminal law. Their strengths and weaknesses continue to account for much of the debate over the politics of war-crime trials today.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.