Skip Navigation

Journal of International Criminal Justice 2004 2(1):56-70; doi:10.1093/jicj/2.1.56
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, T. Hon. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The International Criminal Court

The Hon. David Hunt1

1 Former Judge of the ICTY

The adoption of the Statute of the International Criminal Court in Rome on 17 July 1998 opened up new hopes and raised new challenges for international criminal justice. Unlike the Statutes of the ad hoc Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda, which were adopted by resolutions of the United Nations Security Council, the Statute of the International Criminal Court was negotiated for years and eventually adopted as a treaty. During these negotiations, many compromises were made to render the Statute acceptable to the largest possible number of states. In particular, the powers of judges were strongly curtailed to assuage the fears of a number of states that the Court could infringe upon their sovereignty. The results of the many restrictions placed upon the judges by the Court’s Statute, by the rules of procedure and evidence and by the Elements of Crimes will be to preclude significantly the necessary judicial development of the law and to restrict the judges substantially to a mechanical function. These limitations appear to demonstrate a certain mistrust by various States in the independence of international criminal courts, and they raise a number of questions concerning the ability of the International Criminal Court to function efficiently as a court of law and the ability of its judges to fulfil their mandate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.